University of Maryland
Sociology 441: Stratification 

Status

People also differ on a variety of dimensions that reflect their perceived standing in the community, what Weber called their "status honor." Thus in India, Brahmin priests may be especially honored even if they are not wealthy or politically powerful (although they usually are). Elites often distinguish between "old money" and "new money", preferring the older even if less abundant forms because newer money has been tainted by the selfish pursuit of personal wealth while older money has been freed to pursue collective goods such as the arts and philanthropy.

More immediately for undergraduates, colleges are often ranked on their status levels with more status usually given to elite private schools such as the Ivy League, less to community colleges, and other places ranked high or low in between these two end points. Similarly, within colleges fraternities and sororities are often ranked by status. These status rankings may be contested, but even this conflict acknowledges a ranking that is commonly accepted even if seen as unfair or inaccurate.

Status often reflects styles of life, especially as they are reflected in consumption patterns. George Ritzer (1999) argues that too much of sociology (and this would certainly apply to stratification) ignores consumption patterns at the expense of production (e.g., how we earn income). Ritzer claims that post-modern society has raised consumption over production as the crucial arena of contemporary life. As yet, most stratification research has not yet picked up this emphasis, but it may be a wave of the future.
 


return to: Sociology 441 home page Sociology 441 schedule Sociology 441 dimensions of inequality

Last updated February 4, 2000
comments to: Reeve Vanneman. reeve@umd.edu