|
Sociology 432: Social Movements
|
Midterm exam study questions
(final version: October 26, 2005)
One essay and five short essay
questions will be randomly selected from the
following questions.
The essays have no right or wrong answer.
You need to show that you can take a clear position,
support it with as many facts and case studies as possible,
and acknowledge exceptions to your argument.
The short essays are more specific, but they also are designed
to test how well you can put together specific evidence with
the more general sociological patterns.
Essay questions
-
Take a position on whether social movements need to adopt tactics that
are more (or less) confrontational/militant/violent in order to be
successful.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of increasing militancy?
Consider all the possible targets of social movements and how they
might be affected by increasing militance.
Support your position with specific examples from
any social movement we have studied.
Acknowledge counter-evidence and exceptions to your main position when
necessary.
-
One of the most popular explanations of the rise and success
of protest movements has been the "resource mobilization" perspective.
Summarize the main arguments of this perspective and give examples
of how it helps explain the rise of social movements.
In your examples,
be specific about what resources contribute to what mobilization.
Then identify what other factors tend to be ignored or at least
de-emphasized by this perspective.
For each of these de-emphasized causes, suggest a specific
case where it might be a mistake to ignore those factors.
Short essay questions
(final revision October 26, 2005)
-
Explain how the "repertoire of contention" varies with the "cycle of
protest".
Describe examples from the history of U.S. social movements that fit
with the usual pattern and any that don't fit.
-
What is the best predictor of the spread of (and the success of)
any particular protest tactics in the civil rights movement?
What is the evidence?
What explains the decline in the use of a tactic?
-
What are two advantages of a formal, more bureaucratic organization
for a social movement? What are two disadvantages?
-
What were the structural (i.e., economic, demographic,
organizational etc.) changes in American society that facilitated
the growth of the civil rights movement?
How did the "indigenous organizational strength" of the civil
rights movement change prior to the 1950s so that a successful social
movement was more likely?
-
What events in the origins of the feminist movement point towards more
cultural framing factors as important?
What events point towards resource mobilization factors as important?
Why might cultural changes be more important for the origins of
a feminist movement than for, say, the origins of the civil rights movement?
-
Describe the major differences in the operations of collectivist
and bureaucratic strands of feminist movement organizations.
Give examples of each strand of movement organization.
-
What were some of the specific goals and changes that the feminist movement
accomplished in the 1970s and 1980s?
How did the different strands of organization, bureaucratic and
collectivist, contribute differentially to these goals?
-
What is the evidence of the decline of the success
of the feminist movement in the last two decades?
What factors have changed since the 1970s that might help account for
that decline?
-
Why are we justified in considering riots as a protest
tactic ?
What is the evidence?
In what sense are they not really a tactic?
-
Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of lawsuits as an effective
protest tactic. Consider its impacts on movement participants
and on opponents. What are some examples of successful uses of the legal
route? some unsuccessful attempts?
-
Why are strikes and boycotts an especially difficult tactic to
make successful?
Use specific examples to illustrate your analysis.
-
Why is the sit-in such an effective protest tactic?
Analyze its impact on relevant targets.
How has it been counteracted by the authorities?
-
Describe three tactics used by the Poletown protesters
and explain their impacts (or lack of impact) on relevant targets.
How does this analysis help us understand their failure?
-
Why is "petitioning" by itself rarely a successful protest tactic?
Use a specific example to illustrate its weaknesses.
Why bother with petitioning at all (i.e., what advantages are
there to choose this tactic)?
-
What is the problem with individual discontent as an explanation
for the rise of social movements?
Use at least one specific example to illustrate your argument.
Then cite a specific counter-example that indicates
discontent may be an important factor in explaining the rise of a protest
movement.
-
What is the evidence that government or social repression
of a social movement is usually effective or is usually
counter-productive?
-
What are the possible positive and negative impacts on more moderate
activists of the rise of radical, militant factions in a social movement?
What does the evidence in the civil rights movement suggest actually
happens?
Last updated October 26, 2005 |
|